Ten Mind Numbing Facts About 360-Degree Appraisal Performance Dimensions

In the UK and beyond, big brands are exhibiting their rainbow credentials, but 360-Degree appraisal performance dimensions businesses are urging for a move past agenda-less rhetoric.

Often used as a tool to support the development of staff in management roles, 360-degree feedback has proven to be useful in monitoring the performance of managers across a business. These review processes provide a forum for managers’ reports and colleagues to voice any concerns, raise issues, or give praise, in regards to their management style. A 360-degree feedback process allows employees to receive confidential and anonymous feedback from people that work with them on a day-to-day basis. For decades, 360-degree feedback has helped managers, individual team members and L&D leaders understand the extent to which the competencies required in a role are held by the individual. The results inform development conversations, action plans and L&D initiatives. It is critical to choose a multi-rater feedback tool, such as the 360 degree review, that is easy to use and review. If raters struggle with too many controls and saving their answers, the completion rate of the survey is more susceptible to go down. Additional training for reviewees on how to choose their reviewers more effectively is recommended which requires resources. If you don’t want to organize a full training, you can create a short guide for reviewees. Also, the ease of use of the interface of 360-degree feedback software may reduce the likelihood of errors in the selection of reviewers. Why bother with a 360 degree feedbackprocess if there is little difference from supervisor-only ratings? Different organizations start at different points. Many organizations' single-source assessment processes provide ratings that do not show a distinct difference between high, medium, or low performance. Also, traditional supervisor-only appraisals too often reward the wrong behaviors and leadership styles. This is the danger zone.



Issues related to confidentiality and anonymity in 360 degree programs are almost always issues of trust. The effective use of 360-degree feedback for development or for appraisal depends on creating an environment that is seen as supportive of individuals, respectful of their needs for privacy, and concerned about their development. When raters' responses are not anonymous or when adequate safeguards have not been developed to protect the anonymity of rater identity, fears of retribution may arise and may result in a lack of candor in their responses or, in fact, to complete nonresponse. A 360-degree, learning-competency instrument can be used by itself to focus specifically on improving a person's ability to learn. Here, the emphasis is less on learning competencies as a means of developing other end-state skills and abilities than on competencies that deserve, in and of themselves, focused developmental efforts. The instrument might be embedded in a training program designed to improve learning skills and strategies, or it could be used when individuals are placed in a developmental assignment to help them understand how their ability and willingness to learn will affect the degree to which they will develop from the assignment. The timing for 360 degree feedbackworks best if the subjects, the employees who were assessed, first receive feedback, preferably supported by training. Shortly after, supervisors receive the reports with the instruction to hold reports for a few days before conducting coaching sessions. A little time allows both employees and supervisors to think about the results and prepare for a thoughtful discussion. Not even the most holistic multi-rater initiatives, such as the 360 degree review, can succeed without the involvement of key decision-makers in a company. And the senior management’s support is indispensable. It is an excellent idea to ask these key stakeholders to agree to join the pilot group. It is crucial to set the proper tone as they share their experiences and feedback with every stakeholder in the organization. Analysis and decision making become easier when an understanding of 360 degree feedback system is woven into the organisational fabric.

Good Development Plan

There are many reasons that 360-degree feedback instruments can be used to measure organizational change relative to organizational strategies. First, they can be used to communicate key skill sets required for the change. Second, 360-degree feedback can indicate areas of performance that may still be problematic and can be addressed through additional development efforts. Third, developmental planning efforts can be assessed and evaluated. Fourth, the results may help to delineate various groups in the organization that have, or have not, responded appropriately to the organizational intervention. Finally, the data may also be broken down by organizational levels to show which may be in need of additional attention. 360 degree feedbackprograms clarify Behavior: The very act of evaluating and measuring a person’s behaviors helps convey what behaviors and skills are important to the organization. In addition, honest and reliable feedback is necessary to test perceptions and expose blind spots. 360 Feedback is a positive disruptor that forces individuals to examine how others experience them in the workplace. It is valuable to speak with a trusted peer or direct report to gather more information. We always say that 360-degree feedback is only the beginning of becoming a better employee or leader. The follow-up conversations often provide more insight than the report itself. 360 degree surveys “break the ice” in feedback-poor environments and create a culture where open performance conversations are valued and encouraged. The 360 degree feedbackprocess creates a beauty contest, where popularity or sociability is more important than performance. No other argument has been presented more often than the concern about popularity bias. Those who present this argument seem to forget that single-source assessments have been consistently criticized as a political or popularity contest with the boss. Integration makes the difference with a 360 degree programme – it makes change realistic and possible. It makes the issues of upset and making the business case simply disappear. If you want to introduce 360 degree feedbackthen look at the bigger picture first and identify where it might fit. Supporting the big vision encompassing 360 appraisal will lead to untold career development initiatives.

Behavior and criteria like professionalism, openness, self-management, interpersonal work-style, responsiveness to others, etc. are areas that questions and queries are broadly based on in a 360 degree review. These are also accompanied by subjective questions about a few things an employee or partner should start doing, stop doing, what they’re doing right, how they can do some things better, etc. A performance review is about the job someone is doing, a 360 review is about an employee’s skills. The goal is to help anyone in the organization (senior leaders and employees) improve their personal skills and behaviors at work. By combining multiple sources of feedback, you’ll get a more complete picture of the employee. Each individual 360 degree rater is human and, therefore, as unreliable as the next. This can result in a poor data yield, which isn’t helpful to the employee, to the manager or to the company. A positive side effect of 360 degree reviews is that they can help teams work more productively and effectively – simply by nature of openly sharing feedback with one another. Research also finds that as teams continue to seek out feedback from one another, they increase trust with each other and are more likely to achieve performance goals. Where companies are interested in using the 360 degree process to measure performance, we often recommend introducing a 360 programme first for development and then transitioning at a point in the future, once the business is ready. Looking into 360 degree feedback can be a time consuming process.

Talking Through The Results

Most leaders live in a feedback vacuum. As they advance in an organization, fewer people are comfortable telling their leader what they are doing well, let alone giving them an entire performance evaluation. Some leaders don’t appreciate criticism and see 360s as a way for colleagues to undermine them. Others feel they are very self-aware, are open to the feedback process, and see no reason to formalize the process. Consistency is key. With any review process, 360-degree feedback is most effective when done consistently and frequently. Establishing a consistent approach for gathering and reviewing feedback will also increase the accuracy of the data you receive. It’s important to remember that 360 degree feedbackshould not be used as a performance management tool to determine salary increases or bonuses. It’s a tool for improving individual development and engagement. Focus on the strengths of your employees and put actions in place to help them improve further. Stick to the goal of positive change and don’t fall into the trap of using the programme to just highlight failures and shortcomings. The data analysis and planning that precedes setting improvement goals is the most important link in the 360 degree evaluation process. The cognitive dissonance between the expected performance and the actual performance creates the targets for improvement. The evaluator in charge of helping the employee set the professional growth plans must combine and assess the types of feedback information and compare this information to the intended outcomes. There may be some insights in 360 feedback which lead to new perspectives that mean you literally see the world differently from that moment on. Many new insights do not fully translate to new behaviours or actions soon enough or for a long enough period for the new habits to get fully installed and in place with reliability. Old habits definitely die hard! A useful and motivating follow-through is therefore key. Nonetheless, a keen understanding of what is 360 degree feedback can be seen to be a multifaceted challenge in any workplace.

360 degree feedbackis gathered from all around you: your direct reports, peers, internal and external “customers” (where appropriate) and your line manager. The results are then collated with your own responses and used to generate a report. The report is discussed in a confidential developmental conversation with a trained facilitator. When a competency model has been developed, it can be translated for a number of applications and rolled out across the full range of HR processes so that it serves to integrate all the relevant conversations and decisions. This way it sets the behavioural language and represents the future culture, and 360 degree feedbackcan be a useful and visible tool in this bag of tricks. When done properly, 360 is highly effective as a development tool. The feedback process gives people an opportunity to provide anonymous feedback to a coworker that they might otherwise be uncomfortable giving. Feedback recipients gain insight into how others perceive them and have an opportunity to adjust behaviors and develop skills that will enable them to excel at their jobs. Your 360 degree framework may not cover the whole of what is relevant for the specific purpose of your 360 degree feedback. This can often occur if you are wanting to use your company competency model and aiming to do 360 degree feedbackfor senior leaders’ development. An organisation-wide model will not cover everything relevant to senior leaders’ work. It may well be missing key aspects that are required in the managing of managers, driving organisational changes and the culture and it may not include sufficient strategic, long-term or political aspects of leadership. 360 degree feedbackhelps us to focus on ‘how’ a task was completed, rather than whether it was completed or not. Thus, providing basis for a detailed discussion and shed light on the employee’s behaviour as well as attitude and team dynamics. This leads to clear and open communication with supervisors and managers, which helps in enhancing overall performance of the organisation and promotes team work. Making sense of 360 feedback software eventually allows for personal and organisational performance development.

Ensures Absolute Respondent Anonymity

One of the biggest problems with 360-degree feedback is that once the questionnaires are collected and information disseminated, the employee is left with a huge (and overwhelming) amount of data. This means they will have a large number of suggestions on how they can improve their performance in the coming months. Just as individual contributors benefit from 360 degree feedbackfrom their managers, managers could use receiving feedback from their direct reports, in addition to that of any colleagues with whom they work closely. There are many advantages that come with having managers participate in 360 degree reviews. The provision of a well-designed feedback report alone, without appropriate support, will decrease the impact of 360-degree feedback. Needed support can come from supervisors, coaches, trainers, or trusted colleagues. Their support can surface in a variety of ways, from helping managers to set goals, to linking the process to developmental activities and enabling the review of development plans. Uncover further facts regarding 360-Degree appraisal performance dimensions on this Wikipedia page.

Related Articles:

Background Insight About 360-Degree feedback applications
More Background Information With Regard To 360 degree evaluation objectives
More Background Insight On 360-Degree assessment initiatives
Supplementary Information With Regard To 360-Degree review tools
More Insight On 360 degree feedback tools

Back to the Home Page